呜乎哀哉…

‘陪伴着很多新加坡人长大,见证了我国成长路程’的报章…什么时候变了样?…

newspaper

阅读这一篇文章时, 老实说, 有些纳闷. 报章不是该据实报导新闻吗? 什么时候也成了
变相的’壹周刊’,凭着笔者或’决策人’的’丰富创意和想象力’来大作文章? 无须求证
见图说故事… 而且尽是负面言词?

我不晓得新明日报是以多少人的抽样调查得出以下结论…

45载光芒 八方贺台庆

标题:新传媒阿姐范文芳,脂粉未抹,尽显残样.

照片完全没经过修饰,就算放大100倍来看,阿姐文芳还是美美的, 何残之有? 明眼人请自行定夺.

+++++++++++++++

45载光芒 八方贺台庆
标题:陈靓王宣疑似想打哈欠,却很用力的克制.

疑似= could be; be suspected to be;doubtful; ambiguous
为什么不能疑似看到艺人做惊险动作时的脸部表情? 而只会朝贬意的方向去想呢?

+++++++++++++++

45载光芒 八方贺台庆
标题: 杨志龙吃面包,馅料还占到他的嘴角.

单纯一张吃东西的照片有必要拿来如此作文章吗? 原来文字人是坚信’美女是不会放
屁’的….

+++++++++++++++

Channel 8 45th Anniversary (73)
标题: 新闻主播黄秀玲被拍到’大小眼’的照片.

Umm… 我这一张是原照, 对于这标题我是挺有意见的… 是’斗鸡眼’看照片, 看不清吧…
就算,就算是… 有必要揭人苍疤落井下石吗?

+++++++++++++++

45载光芒 八方贺台庆
标题: 姚懿珊被拍到嘟着嘴,可能是因为台庆节目太沉闷.

可能? 可能=或许=联想
这样的假设, 如果我告诉你其实当下她是因为看到荧幕上出现已故四大笑将的画面
而泛起的表情,你会不会觉得这样的假设标题对节目制作队伍,姚懿珊或是荧幕上出
现的艺人有些不公平呢?

++++++++++

报章拥有广大的阅读群, 如果为了达到’娱乐’效果和拉拢读者而毫无肆纪的自写自爽
,我想那真是有些违反了应有的职业道德.

传达的非真实情况,以煽动和影响阅读者往错误方向去联想,这样的出发点对任何人都
不公平. 或许执笔的面对某些决策人所施加的压力.如果真是如此, 那高坐在办公室的真的该
有所省思.

就因为这样…

或许再也不会有幕后漏网镜头的出现…
或许艺人会架起面具以防被没必要的贴上’报章极具想象力而设下的贬意标题’…
或许…. 每一个人以后一看到我拿起相机… 马上就会跑……

呜乎哀哉….

欢迎留言, 我想报章和我都想听听大家的意见, 也许我太偏激或敏感了一些需要被点
醒,也许你该让有关报章的决策人知道他们的抽样调查或是假设的标题是’有问题’的
… … 谢谢! 报告完毕!

41 thoughts on “呜乎哀哉…”

  1. um, dun think so much bah.
    i think the reporters are juz trying to do their jobs to pull up sales..
    i believe they are juz exaggerating.. but how creative of them eh! =x
    entertainment news.
    cant totally believe one lah.
    i suppose those who read le would juz laugh and forget it.
    dun take it to heart ya? take care!

  2. 无冕皇帝的道德早已无存,荣少您出此文章莫非是贵公司还是艺人朋友看了报导后也
    有所怨言? 哈

  3. Guess dat’s how reporters work. Something oudda nothing. I seriously feel the pictures are perfectly alright! And NO!!! Plz do not run away when Dasmond take pictures… (:

  4. This is so ridiculous. Please spare a thought for others and not landing people in shit hole… our entertainment scene needs variety, cannot belief news reporters are the ones destroying everything by lame reports. Sin Ming sucks big time!

  5. Same sentiments dasmond. I was actually quite shock to see the report in the papers today. I don think you will put such degrading remarks to the photos. Its always not gd to assume, moreover, to assume and report things that does not reflect the author’s comment. And furthermore, they had the guts to put your blog address in the report which i thought was not very right since the report does not reflect your opinions. Well I think they should at least make an apology, not only to you but also to the actors/actresses that are in the criticism spotlight. Somehow i just cant imagine how irresponsible reporters are nowadays when they ‘steal’ content from one person and make their own assumptions which are totally wrong. Seriously very disappointed indeed.

  6. Relax! (:
    It’s their job afterall, can’t really blame them i guess.
    For Felicia’s photo, i really agree with you.
    It’s more like a shock face’s photo instead of um, trying to yawn?
    Look at her eyes, it’s quite obvious(:

    45th is suppose to be a happy thing, so get over it!(:

  7. Hi Dasmond!

    Long time since I last left a message.

    Be careful here – you are treading a thin line. By exhibiting those photographs of celebrities, you are actually using your status as a celebrity to gain access to angle shots which may not be possible with non-celebrity photographers. If one of the photographed celebrity sues you for tainting their public image without your permission, your excuse “photography is your hobby” will not cut it.

    I don’t know what the reporters said about you recently but I think you should seek permission from those celebrities before posting these non-posed photographs up or other celebrities will shun you or even blame you for exposing their unintended facial expressions not meant for exposure.

    I know defenders may say this excites the entertainment circle news and done merely out of fun but public images of celebrities may have been cultivated over a long time and one wrong photo can do a lot of damage intentionally or unintentionally.

    Just my opinion.

    ( understand. Thanks ya 🙂 – from 22 )

  8. dont be too affected by the article ya?
    i think they seriously should transfer they energy to writing stuff that are concrete rather than 看图讲故事..
    must say they really have wild imagination…

    i think it’s seriously degrading for him to do such a thing.
    i’m sure all of us who read ur posts do not have such silly thoughts..

  9. Hi Dasmond…

    I think there’s nothing wrong with u putting up these photos…It’s good publicity for the show and also, I think many people would be interested in these “behind the scenes” photos, as it really reflects the artistes and not just the 光鮮亮麗glamorous look they always portray on tv. Besides, this is ur blog, and these artistes r ur friends…so why can’t u put their photos on ur blog? Besides, when I first saw these photos…I was more amused and captured than anything…n frankly, they dun look half bad here…(esp. not fann, hello?!? she looks nice in that photo lor!!!)

    I have seen the gradual change in our 晚報…nowadays, they keep trying to sensationalize the news, and the whole feel is just very “tabloid”… I am actually pretty disappointed in them for coming up with this kind of super 無聊article, with (i feel) ZERO news value…and I will be really sad if one day they become like the hongkong/taiwan paparazzi….

    Just my personal opinions… Dun be too affected by this ok? 明眼人看得出誰對誰錯,公道自在人心。I really hope this will not discourage u from taking and posting up photos in future….

  10. Hi there,
    mmm…Last night i jz browsed through ur webpage for the event’s photos because i missed the show ….. was impressed by all this snapshots as they are so ‘real’… and they are perfectly fine~!

    Just now was reading the paper but i was shocked by the title…. because those pictures not really as ‘jia lat’ as the description.

    anyway,i am wondering how these artiste feel after reading the this article!

    🙂

  11. well, i just think that they’re lack of news…
    Singapore showbiz is too small… thats why minor stuffs will be magnified.
    dont be affected!
    =D

    sorrry but i am really interested to know are you using DSLR?

  12. I always visit your blog for the wonderful thoughts and wonderful photos you share. Please do not stop sharing…

    Different people have different perception of what a photo shows. Shin Min was just trying to influence people’s perception of the photos to create news & promote sales. Can they use your photos without your permission?

  13. Hi Dasmond, I totally don’t think that you’re at fault. This is your blog, you have the rights to post anything you want, moreover, the pictures don’t really depicts the artises in a bad light. I think the reporter which reported about you had nothing much to do, but to make topic. So, no worries okay, don’t take it to heart. 🙂

  14. 这年度,劲爆竟已成了种”美德“!不劲爆,没销量。你看新明、晚报的头版标题,都是如此。
    新明一向如此,看新明的,也都抱着“不能尽信”的态度 —— 至少我仍希望、相信,读者是懂得思考的,眼睛是雪亮的。谁会真认为你是故意拍下同行的窘样子,除非那人认为你不想干了。

    只是,我国大众传媒业堕落至此,好似没了对“大众”、“当事人”的责任心,只求“劲爆”,这实在叫人扼腕叹息!唉!

  15. Hi Dasmond,

    When I saw those photos on your website, I thought they were wonderful as they show the ‘human’ side of the artists. At that moment, I feel a little closer to you artists, instead of those that I see on tv, always so glamorous and out of reach. I also interpret them as I see it, no malicious thoughts at all.
    The newspaper is really too imaginative and manipulative. I don’t know how those artists who are criticised will think but I certainly hope that they would not blame you. That would suck big time if they do!
    Keep doing what you think is right. I’m sure those who support and agree with you will always be there for you.

  16. hey, dun think too much k. I jux read the newspaper’s report today & i’ve found ur blog address through d paper. See they helped to promoted u FOC leh! how’s nice ?haha..
    Yar i agreed with wat u’ve posted.
    Jia You la.

    P/S- Fen Shou Kuai le to Ms Yi Feng

  17. 记得很多年前,有某位外地明星到新加坡以后,尽赞本地媒体。说他们很专业,不炒作,以事论事,更是没有狗仔的行为,所以该艺人觉得来到新加坡最自在,无需担忧被偷拍乱写。我对此事一直引以为傲。

    我觉得本地的报章会‘煽情’,很多时侯都处于一种 demand and supply 的经济学论。读者买就代表喜欢,喜欢就是包容这种报道风格。而标题‘劲爆’ 是风气吧。我曾在一位传媒人士的博客上,因其‘煽情’的标题而留言,回复是:标题需要引人注意。

    新明的这则新闻,如果仔细读,其实是不带恶意的报道,我反觉得是记者朋友有些用词不当(如:‘疑似’若写成‘看似’,效果会轻松得多),也忘了在标题的’真面目‘,打上引号(inverted comma), 也有点想把caption 写得搞笑,却似乎写着写着,就过了火。因此,也忘了笔下留情。

    而振荣的疏忽,是忘了在该文章附上这行字:
    “此文章的所有内容和照片属版主的私人收藏,谢绝引用,禁止媒体转载。”

    即使是私人博客,除非不向外公开,只供亲友阅读,不然就等于是:‘公共文章’。
    无伤大雅,毕竟艺人和记者都是同一媒介,多个朋友是好的。

  18. The photos were candid and I feel that celebrities should show us (audiences) who they really are, without posing and acting. Candid photos speak for themselves, not with captions. Those captions only spoil the photos’s beauty and they restrict the viewer’s perception!

    I strongly believe that you have many experience in the entertainment industry and have come across many other articles that were spun out of the reporters’ threads. They are merely doing their job by spinning tales for the sake of hitting sales target.

    Just continue to be yourself and be real~

    Cheers!

  19. 媒体的断章取义,为的只是吸引读者的目光,只能说是我们的媒体,还是处于“真空”状态,没有内容,只好从这些芝麻绿豆的小事挖掘新闻。
    不得不同意振荣你说的,不知道什么时候新加坡的报章媒体变得根台湾的一样了。。。

  20. Ya, i can totally understand how you feel… to have all the truth being distorted esp when the photos originate from you.~!! & the photos look perfectly fine to me..

    Yay, hope you don’t get affected too much by these *attention-seeking reporters* & continue to share more with us. I do agree that i love the photos u took..

    **Btw, those reporters gotten the permission before publishing your photo? Guess in future, will need to know the contents too. Jia You =)**

  21. hi desmond, after my dad’s case, i don’t believe in local news any more, wat they want is HEADLINE to attract readers, the contents is not important to them whether they’ve hurt the family or not.

  22. 看图说故事、挑拨离间,这些狗仔队的可恶行径,就连新加坡的媒体人都开始有样学样了。我本身看到了这则新闻后,就觉得非常的无聊。其实我们在朋友聚会时,都喜欢拍些照片。这些 in-action 的照片只不过是想要记录下当时最真实的感觉罢了?相信振荣你也不是像要丑化自己的同事朋友的吧?真的太太太太太太无聊了。

    希望新加坡的媒体工作者能够维持新加坡的形象- 公平、公正、公开。请不要在做出这些无聊的举动了!

  23. 娱乐新闻,如果安安分分登在娱乐版,我们当可一笑置之。

    讽刺的是,本地狗仔其实并不来自娱乐版,而是堂堂正正的新闻组。
    报章杂志娱乐组的记者向来和艺人保持良好的关系,即使是写八卦也还不至于无中生有。只要读者稍微留意,不难发现近年来这些内容往往毫不属实,而且明眼人一看就知道都是上网拿人家部落格的内容来歪曲夸大、栽赃嫁祸、断章取义、故意挑起事端的文章,竟然是敢敢刊登在“本地新闻版”的,这问题就大了。

    如果是因为i之前太多受害者忍气吞声、姑息他们,造成他们才变本加厉、得意忘形,我绝对支持你把这篇回应写出来,并且向他们表达强烈的不满。

  24. 你拍的照片都是candid shot,很美,很自然。编辑头脑不是有问题就是故意制造新闻博销量。可怜艺人们被品头论足,没一句好话。算了,振荣,狗嘴里哪里长得出象牙呢?

    我也可以这么说:
    文芳那张,拍得她很酷呢!
    靓瑄那张,非常自然,你手脚够快,把她对表演赞叹的表情拍得那么美。
    阿Ben肚子饿了吧?一定是太忙了,赶着来出席,还没吃饭吧?真敬业。
    主播们那么投入的看表演。(每个人做表情反应的时候,眼睛都会跟着动,我们又不是木偶。因为表情而有大小的问题有什么好奇怪的?叫那个人自己对着镜子练习一下不同的动作看看自己的眼睛是不是一样大小)
    懿珊哪里有嘟嘴?只是合紧了嘴唇,正看着精彩的节目啊。

    照片清晰又自然,明智的读者不会不明白是记者自己加盐加醋的结果。

  25. 我也察觉了近几年来,本地记者有效仿港台的现象,报道艺人私生活,做狗仔队追踪艺人的生活。
    没错,做艺人就是公众人物,得接受 (吃的咸鱼抵得渴)

    但是这并不代表报章记者就能够为所欲为的乱作文章,来误导了一些观众,记者们,拿自己的饭碗来换取艺人的私生活,这种饭你们吃的安心吗???这种缺德事,你们晚上睡得可安宁吗??你们还是人吗??

    拿艺人的真实事情和故事来报道,如果是真有其事,不好的事情,身为艺人的就得检讨,这就是娱乐圈的游戏规则。但是把艺人的事情和访问,断章取义的来报道,这并不是他们应该接受的,振荣我支持你!!

    希望新传媒或艺人工会,能够举办保护艺人的活动,也让读者和艺人的支持者,有个地方来让他们对于报章记者们的胡乱报道,不道德的行为,来做出支持。。我相信一定会有很多人支持的,祝福你们,艺人们。。加油!!!

  26. lol. this is so ridiculous.
    for
    I hope they won’t mind you posting their photos on your blog.

    But never mind, take it as an entertainment for the audience.>_<

  27. i think it’s damn rude of them to just rip photos from your website.
    But i hope this doesnt stop you from blogging.

    看开一点,笑一笑 没有事情是 过不了的。 =)

  28. .. didn’t see it till I see our post. i believe what you post is what you want to show us about the real life of artists backstage, and that’s what i would like to see. in this way, i get to know other mediacorp artists better. It’s great that you are promoting your fellow mediacorp artists. pls don’t be discouraged by reports which put-down artists, just treat it as a FOC advertisement for those artists and your blog:)

    I believe your fellow friends in the industry won’t run away from your camera:)

  29. Hey Dasmond,

    Don’t fret over it. They are just being ridiculous as usual. I think you should be used to it now, just like all the other celebrities who were featured? Especially since the newspapers are published by a rival company. I think they just want to jack up sales, or perhaps come up with something more extraordinary, rather than the usual reporting.

    Anyway, I think perhaps they should have sought permission from you before publishing these photos. If you are really unhappy, would you want to sue them? But again, if we look at the bright side, perhaps the malice intended might not be as strong as the light-hearted humour that might actually be what the newspaper reporter wanted to acheive instead?

    Cheerz!

  30. hi,你好,第一次在这里留言呢^^
    现在的新闻都越来越变质了。。不,已经不是新闻了,而是"八卦"
    每天翻开娱乐版。。不是某某艺人分手、就是某某艺人的私生活怎样。拜拖,艺人也是人,也需要自己的私人空间

    振荣,不要理他们,我支持你!

  31. well.. i agree with jasmine, guess it’s very rude for the papers to just strip photos from your blog..
    no wonder celebs’s blogs are locking up..zzZzz

    well..i seriously believe that it’s your blog..you can post whatever you like..
    and i frequent your blog to see those back scene pictures..which i really enjoy..
    i smile looking at them and forget awhile later =)

    the papers SHOULD NOT just took your post and 添油加醋..cause it’s very misleading..

    i feel that celeb is just human afterall..they always cant be GLAMOUROUS every second..
    just because singapore’s showbiz is small..
    艺人的真;善;美 is being magnified..

    cheer up dasmond =)

  32. 荣少。。。看开点,笔在他人手,嘴在他人脸,他人要怎麽写怎麽说。你拿他没择。不过真的要对那些被登报的艺人说对不起。

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.